recent comments

Compteur


1668661 visiteurs

Useful Links
“what’s the date today ?” ;)
April 2018
M T W T F S S
« Mar    
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30  
Proverb of the day

A thing of beauty is a joy forever

Quote of the day

Posts Tagged ‘places and forms of power’

11-Year-Old Naomi Wadler Speaks At The March For Our Lives

Monday, April 2nd, 2018

She’s only 11 !!

 

YouTube Preview Image

Three Billboards outside Ebbing, Missouri

Monday, March 26th, 2018
YouTube Preview Image

25 of the best signs from March for Our Lives demonstrations

Sunday, March 25th, 2018

http://www.upworthy.com/25-of-the-best-signs-from-march-for-our-lives-demonstrations-around-the-globe?c=ufb1

‘One Life Is Worth More Than All The Guns in America’: Sarah Chadwick at March for Our Lives

Sunday, March 25th, 2018
YouTube Preview Image

Delaney Tarr from Stoneman Douglas High School speaks at March for our Lives Rally

Sunday, March 25th, 2018
YouTube Preview Image

Emma Gonzalez

Sunday, March 25th, 2018
YouTube Preview Image

The Cranberries

Tuesday, January 16th, 2018

WHILE many of us have sang along to The Cranberries’ biggest hit song Zombie, few of us are familiar with the tragedy that inspired Dolores O’Riordan to write it. 

O’Riordan died yesterday morning in a London hotel room, on a day the 46 year old was due to record her vocals for a new version of her iconic hit Zombie.

Written during the band’s UK tour in 1993 and released the following year, Zombie is in memory of two children killed in an IRA bombing in Warrington, Cheshire.

Two bombs detonated within a minute of each other in litter bins on Bridge Street on March 20, killing three year old Johnathan Ball and injuring 12 year old Tim Parry who died five days later.

The IRA claimed responsibility for the attack, but insisted they had given two warnings prior to detonation and police had failed to act in time.

Moved by the violence, the Limerick singer penned the five minute song in a seething condemnation of the IRA and a visceral response to the death of two young children.

“I remember seeing one of the mothers on television, just devastated,” she told Vox magazine in 1994.

“I felt so sad for her, that she’d carried him for nine months, been through all the morning sickness, the whole thing and some prick, some airhead who thought he was making a point, did that.”

O’Riordan was particularly offended that terrorists claimed to have carried out these acts in the name of Ireland.

“The IRA are not me. I’m not the IRA,” she said. “The Cranberries are not the IRA. My family are not.

“When it says in the song, ‘It’s not me, it’s not my family,’ that’s what I’m saying. It’s not Ireland, it’s some idiots living in the past.”

“I don’t care whether it’s Protestant or Catholic, I care about the fact that innocent people are being harmed,” she told Vox. “That’s what provoked me to write the song.

“It was nothing to do with writing a song about it because I’m Irish. You know, I never thought I’d write something like this in a million years. I used to think I’d get into trouble.”

She later told NME in 1994: “[Zombie] doesn’t take sides. It’s a very human song.

“To me, the whole thing [terrorism] is very confused. If these adults have a problem with these other adults well then, go and fight them. Have a bit of balls about it at least, you know?”

This morning, Tim Parry’s father Colin Parry told Good Morning Ulster that he had been touched by the lyrics did not realise they were written about his son until after O’Riordan’s death.

“Only yesterday did I discover that her group, or she herself, had composed the song in memory of the event in Warrington,” he said.

“I was completely unaware what it was about.

“I got the song up on my laptop, watched the band singing, saw Dolores and listened to the words.

“The words are both majestic and also very real.

“The event at Warrington, like the many events that happened all over Ireland and Great Britain, affected families in a very real way and many people have become immune to the pain and suffering that so many people experienced during that armed campaign.

“To read the words written by an Irish band in such compelling way was very, very powerful.

“I likened it to the enormous amount of mail expressing huge sympathy that we received in the days, weeks and months following our loss.

“Proportionately a very high total of that came from the island of Ireland,” he said.

Royal rules

Tuesday, January 16th, 2018

This is why Meghan Markle can’t wear the crown jewels (but Kate can) ….

<p>Meghan Markle, 36, and Prince Harry, 33, are set to get married on May 19 — and although it’s no secret the gorgeous former actress <a rel="nofollow" href="https://ca.style.yahoo.com/4-unofficial-royal-rules-meghan-035649170.html">has broken a number of unwritten royal traditions</a> over the course of their year-and-a-half whirlwind courtship (including this <a rel="nofollow" href="https://ca.style.yahoo.com/why-kate-middleton-wont-sign-slideshow-wp-201315694/photo-p-meghan-markle-36-prince-photo-185015595.html">royal fashion faux-pas</a> during the engagement announcement) — there’s one royal rule she won’t be able to break: wearing the crown jewels before her wedding. <em>(Photo: Kensington Palace) </em> </p>

Meghan Markle, 36, and Prince Harry, 33, are set to get married on May 19 — and although it’s no secret the gorgeous former actress has broken a number of unwritten royal traditions over the course of their year-and-a-half whirlwind courtship (including this royal fashion faux-pas during the engagement announcement) — there’s one royal rule she won’t be able to break: wearing the crown jewels before her wedding.

This is because, according to The Mirror, royal etiquette rules prevent unmarried women from wearing tiaras.

“Flashy diamonds and tiaras are not worn during the day, and only married ladies wear tiaras,” Grant Harold,  the U.K.’s premiere etiquette expert, told the BBC.  “For married ladies it was a sign of status and would show you were taken and not looking for a husband.”

So while Meghan has to wait until after marriage before accessing the crown jewels, a very married Kate Middleton is able to wear them right now.

Darkest Hour

Sunday, January 14th, 2018
YouTube Preview Image

‘The Silence Breakers’ Named Time’s Person of the Year for 2017

Friday, December 8th, 2017

First it was a story. Then a moment. Now, two months after women began to come forward in droves to accuse powerful men of sexual harassment and assault, it is a movement.

Time magazine has named “the silence breakers” its person of the year for 2017, referring to those women, and the global conversation they have started.

The magazine’s editor in chief, Edward Felsenthal, said in an interview on the “Today” show on Wednesday that the #MeToo movement represented the “fastest-moving social change we’ve seen in decades, and it began with individual acts of courage by women and some men too.”

Investigations published in October by The New York Times and The New Yorker, both of them detailing multiple allegations of sexual harassment and assault against the movie producer Harvey Weinstein, sparked the sudden rush of women coming forward.

In a joint interview after the choice was announced, Tarana Burke, who created the Me Too mantra years ago, and the actress Alyssa Milano, who helped promote it more recently, focused on what was still left to do.

“I’ve been saying from the beginning that it’s not just a moment, it’s a movement,” Ms. Burke said. “I think now the work really begins. The hashtag is a declaration. But now we’re poised to really stand up and do the work.”

Ms. Milano agreed, laying out her aspirations for the movement.

“I want companies to take on a code of conduct, I want companies to hire more women, I want to teach our children better,” she said. “These are all things that we have to set in motion, and as women we have to support each other and stand together and say that’s it, we’re done, no more.”

It is a testament to the size of the movement that the set of “Today” itself, where the announcement was made, had recently been the site of such a reckoning. Matt Lauer, one of NBC’s most well-known personalities for decades, was fired only last week after an allegation of sexual harassment from a subordinate. Other complaints soon followed.

And of course, Time’s 2017 runner-up for person of the year, Donald J. Trump, was accused during his presidential campaign by more than 10 women of sexual misconduct, from unwanted touching to sexual assault.

Tarana Burke, the woman who realized the power of the simple words “Me Too,” marched with others in Los Angeles in November. Credit Lucy Nicholson/Reuters

Those accusations did not stop Mr. Trump from being named person of the year in 2016. And Mr. Trump inadvertently promoted this year’s announcement, tweeting that he had been told he would “probably” be chosen again and claiming to have turned down the honor. Time quickly released a statement saying that the president was incorrect.

Time has been using the title for more than nine decades to drum up interest in one of its tentpole issues. The magazine chose its first group, as opposed to a single “man of the year” (and back then it was a man), in 1950, when it selected “the American Fighting-man.” The title was changed to the neutral “person of the year” in 1999.

Other groups have included “Americans under 25” in 1966, “The Whistleblowers” in 2002 and, memorably, “You” in 2006.

In 1975, the magazine chose “American women,” profiling a dozen who it said “symbolized the new consciousness of women generally.” It would be a decade before Time selected another woman.