CLONING
Cloning is a process that consists in picking up cells or DNA fragments from one organism to create a new one. The cells have to be genetically identical. Now cloning is part of debate : some of the people are in favour of cloning but others are not. That’s why we will try to answer a few questions : is cloning really necessary? What is the main purpose of this method?
Cloning gives us a new possibility that we didn’t know before.
First of all, cloning can help people to replace someone that died. For example, the parents that lost their children can recreate them with the same exact genes. As a result, they will be identical : the same color of hair and eyes, the same face shape or skin color, the same gender etc. Another point is that it can save other people’s lives. Human beings with AIDS can die. It is impossible to help them, because they cannot get an organ which could be transplanted. Cloning could give them a chance to have those organs transplanted, without problems with adopting a new one.
But we personally are against cloning.
If we take the previous example of cloned children, we can say that it is a different person in the same body. The problem may be a family who thinks that it’s the same child they’ve got in the past. The truth is that this method gives them a different child. They look alike because they have identical characteristics but not the same behavior, same personality or preferences.
To conclude, cloning isn’t necessary for everyone. Sometimes this method can help fight off various diseases, but it is not the best option to replace a person. Everybody’s life will end one day and being ourself is the best option. Cloning people prevents them from having their own identity which can negatively affect their well-being.
Written by : Marta, Aghiles, Yahn, Kamila.
I think the cloning is a great idea for persons who need organs implant or members implant but some people will do trafic with clones and will be a new problem in the society. If this processus is use in medical field and just for sick person, it’s not a problem. But it’s not a good idea for the society, I think it is necessary to search in others methods of treatment.
I agree with what the article says, cloning is not necessarily something necessary in our lives, we can do without it. Of course he could help sick people but can never replace a life, a person. we can help a person to go better by another way but it is not by changing his personality or our identities or anything else. personally I am against this idea.
I don’t agree with what is it write. When a member of our family dies of course it’s hard but this is what we are no? So more we don’t accept the reality and more it’s hard to continue.
I don’t agree with what is it write. When a member of our family dies of course it’s hard but this is what we are no? So more we don’t accept this and more it’s hard for us.
In my opinion the cloning is not a bad thing in the global idea. Like they say the cloning can save lifes and in their project this is the best thing. I don’t agree at all to the idea who can do a resurrection. Finally the cloning project si good in a half hand and is bad in the other.
I agree with what is it write in the article. I think when a member of our family dies it’s hard but this is what we are no ? Human born and die one day. So more we don’t accept this and more it’s hard to continue. So even if we can recreate the person in front of us is not the same.
I’m desagree with this article because I think that society can do without this technical progress. There is a lot of inconvenience when creating a clone because you can not replace a person. He will have the same physique but not the same behavior.
Moreover, it causes organ trafficking which will be an additional problem in society. This practice is expensive and they are specialized for a rich clientele.
You can’t comment on the subject you worked on.
I agree with the cloning method. This technique saves lives. This cloning technique can remove a person’s health problems. She can give a second chance to the sick person. A person who is about to die can be saved by cloning. But people can make use of cloning to duplicate the same person several times. It is better to make use of cloning in the medical than in the duplication of person
Cloning has good arguments, but I’m not for it. cloning people would be like differentiating normal people from clones, and would therefore lead to strong inequalities in rights. We can also ask ourselves if the clone is an independent person or an object? Does a clone accept to be a copy and not “someone” in its own right? Moreover, cloning can be used to make both “cannon pulpit” and slaves, whereas they are the basis of living beings, and even human beings! Finally, is cloning really reasonable when the issue of overpopulation is becoming more and more important?
I don’t think the cloning is a good idea for substitue a person who died. Because someone die never go back. But for help somebody, I’m agree with this. It’s a good thing if we are able to save a person who got AIDS, it’s very good. The cloning it’s remarkable but to use wisely.
I agree with you on some points. Mainly when you say that cloning shouldn’t be use to recreate a dead person since cloning can only remake the person’s genes and not the behavior. But I think that cloning could be a good thing if it was capable to recreate the personality, some people can’t survive to the death of a loved one.
Also, I think the cloning is a very good thing if we can remake compatible organs for ill people because there’s a big lack of bloods and organs.
Personally I am against cloning because I think it is useless to want to replace a deceased person. I think that if some parents resort to cloning when they lose a member of their family it is to reassure themselves. I think we can do without cloning even for organ transplants medicine has progressed enormously so to cure patients they can find other solutions.